On February 28, the United States launched the most intense military strike since the Gulf War. In coordination with Israel, it carried out airstrikes on Iran under the codename “Operation Epic Fury.” Within 12 hours, more than 500 military targets across Iran were destroyed. Iran’s Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei and senior military officials were also killed in a precise decapitation strike. Iran retaliated by attacking Israeli and U.S. military bases in the Middle East. The already fragile regional order quickly collapsed, pushing global politics and the economy into deeper uncertainty. For Taiwan, thousands of kilometers away, the geopolitical conflict in the Middle East not only poses economic challenges and tests Taiwan’s resilience, but under the broader context of U.S.–China rivalry may also create unpredictable bargaining variables.
...read more
Two international developments in succession introduce significant variables affecting future U.S.–Taiwan relations. First, on the evening of February 16, President Donald Trump of the United States stated aboard Air Force One that he was discussing future arms sales to Taiwan with Chinese President Xi Jinping and revealed that a decision would be made soon. Shortly thereafter, on February 20, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the “reciprocal” tariffs imposed by President Trump on nearly all countries under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act were invalid.
...read more
After a video conference with Russian President Vladimir Putin on February 4, Chinese President Xi Jinping had an unannounced phone call with President Donald Trump of the United States. This unusual situation was clearly strategic communication that bypassed diplomatic protocol: Major power leaders spoke directly to make things clear and avoid misjudgment. This is extremely rare in great-power competition and usually only occurs when something has happened and there is an urgent need to deal with it.
...read more
Communist China’s purge of the People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) top leadership in early 2026, if viewed merely as an anti-corruption drive or a disciplinary rectification, undoubtedly underestimates the historical weight of the event. What is truly chilling about the Zhang Youxia case lies in its highly structural similarity to the “Lin Biao incident” half a century ago—the target of the purge is not a peripheral figure, but the most senior military figure closest to the core of power, long regarded as one of “our own.”
...read more
President Donald Trump of the United States has declared that the incorporation of Greenland into the country is “irreversible.” Therefore, this issue is no longer a low-probability, idle topic, but will be a “black swan” event forcing a dramatic historical turn.
...read more
After eight months of negotiations, the outcome of the U.S.-Taiwan tariff negotiations has finally been revealed. On the surface, Taiwan secured the same 15 percent non-cumulative tariff treatment as Japan and South Korea, and obtained most-favored-nation tariff arrangements for certain automobiles, aviation components, and wooden furniture under Section 232. In exchange, however, Taiwan’s government must assist domestic companies in investing up to US$250 billion in the United States and provide credit guarantees to support financial institutions in extending loans to Taiwanese firms investing in the United States, also amounting to as much as US$250 billion.
...read more
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lin I-chin’s proposal to amend the Act Governing Relations between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area—framed as an attempt at “de jure Taiwan independence”—ultimately collapsed. The proposal sought to rename the existing law as the “Act Governing Relations between the People of Taiwan and the People of the People’s Republic of China,” and to delete language in the original provisions referencing “prior to national unification” and other text reflecting the constitutional framework of the Republic of China, in an effort to reinforce, through legislation, the political narrative of “two states across the Taiwan Strait.” Yet this farce dragged on and ended hastily; meanwhile, DPP legislators who took part in this political drama found themselves contradicted by Legislator Lin’s own feigned performance, effectively “slapping themselves in the face.”
...read more
The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) launched the “Justice Mission–2025” encirclement drills around Taiwan without prior warning, approaching Taiwan’s territorial waters and conducting live-fire exercises. In response, President Donald Trump of the United States downplayed the threat posed by the PLA drills, while the Japan maintained a low-key silence. What came as a surprise was that a photograph released by CCTV showing a PLA drone overlooking Taipei 101 unexpectedly became a topic of widespread speculation surrounding the drills. Yet the Ministry of National Defense (MND) claimed this was “cognitive warfare” and urged the public not to be manipulated—does it truly regard “exercises” as merely “acting”?
...read more
Five grand justices of the Constitutional Court handed down the earth-shaking Constitutional Judgment No. 1 of 2025, declaring in a single stroke that “the amendment to the Constitutional Court Procedure Act is unconstitutional and immediately void,” instantly reviving a paralyzed Constitutional Court at full strength. This sensational ruling is steeped in political overtones, forcibly reducing procedural justice to a mere technicality and effectively making clear that the Constitutional Court intends to act as the ruling party's best assisting hand. It not only shakes the foundations of constitutional governance but also drags democratic rule of law down with it.
...read more
The plan by the administration of President Lai Ching-te to adopt measures of non-countersignature and non-implementation regarding the Fiscal Allocation Act disregards the majority will of the legislature and uses administrative power to nullify legislative authority. This not only creates a grave constitutional precedent but also intensifies confrontation between the ruling and opposition camps, offering no help in advancing national governance. From the Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) legislative caucus to its governing team, over the past year they have repeatedly accused opposition parties of destroying the Constitution and undermining governance. Yet those truly doing so are the governing authorities themselves. Or rather, the real question is: does the Republic of China Constitution still exist in the minds of the DPP administration?
...read more